July 23, 2008
Thirty-Eight Witnesses: A Review
From The Chicago Tribune:
Catherine "Kitty" Genovese was 28 when she was stabbed to death in the New York City borough of Queens in 1964, but she and the circumstances surrounding her death remain alive in public reflexes every time we encounter what social psychologists often refer to as the bystander effect.
A.M. Rosenthal, who was metropolitan editor of the New York Times when the murder happened and so was in charge of its coverage, wrote a book shortly after the killing that is by turns indignant, self-excoriating and insightful not just on the social responsibilities of community but also on the paradoxes and foibles of journalism. Titled Thirty-Eight Witnesses, after the number of people at the time assumed to have knowledge of the crime but who did not report it as it occurred, it has just been reprinted after 44 years. While it resembles a time capsule in some respects, several of the haunting questions Rosenthal raised, generalized to any such situation, remain unanswerable, and link as firmly to the present as they did to their own time.
Rosenthal recounts one of the follow-up stories that the Times produced in the wake of the murder, contacting a random selection of sociologists, psychologists and theologians in search of perspective. From the sociologist who pointed to "'affect denial'" to the theologian who spoke of New York's "'depersonalizing'" effects but asked not to be identified, Rosenthal noted that "the reaction of almost every one of these social physicians was to admit total failure on their part to understand." As social psychologist Stanley Milgram, best known for his studies on authority and obedience, put it at a conference 20 years after the murder, the case represents "our primordial nightmare. If we need help, will those around us stand around and let us be destroyed or will they come to our aid?"
More here.
Posted by Azra Raza at 05:05 AM | Permalink






Comments
I'd like to think that people wouldn't let that happen today, or that only big-city dwellers could be so uncaring, but just this week I read about the gypsy girls who drowned on a beach in Italy. Two of the girls were rescued, but this photo of the bodies of the two dead girls barely covered with beach towels surrounded by contented sun worshippers is rather chilling:
http://arbroath.blogspot.com/2008/07/gypsy-girls-corpses-on-beach-in-italy.html
Posted by: Marilyn Terrell | Jul 23, 2008 9:11:19 AM
In a sense we have gone to the opposite extreme. Not long ago a man in a Long Island suburb was taken in by police for questioning when several people phoned in to report a suspicious character. His crime? Having a cigarette in the car outside his apartment which happened to be near a school. You could not spit in the street now without 5 or 10 people dialing 911.
Posted by: Jared | Jul 23, 2008 10:02:30 AM
Gave me the chills when I read this review. Would I be willing to risk my own life if faced by a similar situation? I didn't want to think about it. Obviously I would like to think that I will have the courage, but having never faced a situation like it one wonders. And there have been so many other similar stories over the years. Maybe this review would shame me and others into acting differently if we ever did face something like it. Thank you for this post.
Posted by: Tasnim | Jul 23, 2008 11:21:10 AM
@Tasnim: But that's the thing-- nobody had to risk their lives to save Kitty Genovese, just pick up the phone and call the police. It wasn't that hard.
Posted by: Marilyn Terrell | Jul 23, 2008 5:50:08 PM
On two occasions I've been in a situation where I could and did help a stranger in distress... yet given the number of people around me who actively tried to discourage me from doing so (even to suggest not to bother calling the cops) it is now clear to me that the failure to act in the Genovese case was not just apathy but an active choice to avoid the personal cost of providing assistance.
This evolved trait of altruism does not always override a quick cost/benefit analysis. And as population density increases, the perceived net cost of helping non-kin does as well.
Posted by: Robin | Jul 24, 2008 1:41:48 AM
Post a comment