February 28, 2008
Speciation Among Liberals and Conservatives
David Sloan Wilson in The Huffington Post (via bookforum):
Thousands of American high school students had participated nationwide by providing extensive background information and being beeped for a week, for roughly 50 snapshots of their individual experience.
With this as our "field study," we began to think about altruism and other do-good behaviors as a strategy that can succeed in some environments but not others. That story is recounted in a chapter titled "The Ecology of Good and Evil" in my book Evolution for Everyone. Then, with my graduate student Ingrid Storm, we decided to make an even finer comparison between youth belonging to liberal and conservative Protestant denominations.
Get this: Everyone in our sample was an American, a teenager, and belonged to the same major religious tradition of Protestantism. In these respects they were culturally uniform. But some belonged to conservative denominations such as Pentecostal and others to liberal denominations such as Episcopalian. As Ingrid combed through the data, which involved tedious hours in front of the computer, the differences that began to emerge were astounding. It was as if these conservative and liberal religious youth were--different species.
For example, two questions that were asked as part of the background information were "Do you think of yourself as a religious person?" and "In your family, do you express opinions even when they differ?" The more liberals agreed with the first question, the more they agreed with the second. The more conservatives agreed with the first question, the less they agreed with the second. Their religions were pulling them in completely different directions.
Posted by Robin Varghese at 05:21 PM | Permalink





Comments
Oh well, the liberals are clearly more open minded. Got it! Let's see did they ask if the liberal protestants were allowed to question the virtues and mission of, say, planned parenthood? Is the value of the life of someone like Terri Schiavo debatable skewing that is to the pro-life side of the argument? What kind of dissent was proffered. Perhaps like the kind on an NPR debate, where three individuals discuss an issue. One is an anarchist, the other a communist, and the third a socialist. Yes, that's liberal dissent.
Posted by: lilimarlene | Feb 29, 2008 7:13:12 AM
Lilimarlene, I think they really do mean dissent, i.e., expressing views that differ from those of your family. That means not something like Planned Parenthood, unless you as a liberal Protestant are expressing doubts about it to a family that supports it.
Posted by: Barkley | Feb 29, 2008 11:59:51 AM
That was, and I mean this, probably the silliest article I've ever seen on 3qd. Where to begin?
1. There are correlations between the type of religion you belong to and your behaviour. Wow. This is absolutely mind-shattering news. "Liberals place a high value on individual autonomy." WOW. A tautology presented as a finding!
2. The suggestion that these correlations point to ANYTHING like a "separate species" result. The use of the term "cultural species", which is, by the way, a contradiction in terms.
3. The rightful admission that such differences are culturally determined (GOOD scientist! good!) followed by an immediate lapse: an attempt to explain the differences as "survival strategies". The usual brainless evopsych mapping of a distinction which is (at best) 300 years old on to an exceedingly distant evolutionary past.
These are dark times, I tell you. Dark.
Posted by: Nick Smyth | Feb 29, 2008 1:45:47 PM
Nick,
For me, this piece will always be memorable for its reasoning prowess:
Got that? 10% of an unspecified quantity is "a lot."
Posted by: Chris Schoen | Feb 29, 2008 2:27:50 PM
Post a comment