January 30, 2008
not a "contrast gainer"
So occupied is "God's Crucible" with every twist and turn of military and political history, in fact, that Mr. Lewis's would-be controversial interpretation, and his lessons for the present, are mostly forgotten. They surface only in the form of occasional valentines to the Spain of the Umayyads — whose "ethos of storied tolerance and mutuality...might have served as a model for the continent" — and corresponding insults to Carolingian Christendom — "an economically retarded, balkanized, fratricidal Europe that, in defining itself in opposition to Islam, made virtues out of religious persecution, cultural particularism, and hereditary aristocracy."The problem with such verdicts is not just that they are unconvincingly reductive, but that they are clichés. If Western readers know anything about Muslim history, it is that Golden Age Spain was a golden age. That this moment of relative tolerance and prosperity coincided with the Dark Ages in Western Europe helps to make it what Saul Bellow called a "contrast gainer."
more from the NY Sun here.
Posted by Morgan Meis at 08:56 AM | Permalink






Comments
This excerpt skips what I find to be the most striking sentence of the review, the first: "How far back in history do you have to go before it stops making sense to take sides?" I have explored in a recent article on my blog ways in which it might become possible, even necessary, not to take sides in the present.
In my work on philosophical ethics, I have been struck by how universally Nazism has been used by the ethics community as the reliable, agreed-upon example of evil that ethics should enable us to avoid. This observation leads me to rephrase Adam Kirsch's question above as follows: "How far back in history do you have to go before historical events begin to seem complex enough as to be morally ambiguous?"
Posted by: nathan | Jan 30, 2008 10:14:08 AM
Post a comment