| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« New solar systems | Main | Race and the Speed of Human Evolution »

December 15, 2007

Forgiveness

Roger Scruton reviews Charles Griswold's Forgiveness in the TLS:

Forgiveness is not achieved unilaterally: it is the result of a dialogue, which may be tacit, but which involves reciprocal communication of an extended and delicate kind. The one who forgives goes out to the one who has injured him, and his gesture involves a changed state of mind, a reorientation towards the other, and a setting aside of resentment. Such an existential transformation is not always or easily attained, and can only be achieved, Griswold suggests, through an effort of cooperation and sympathy, in which each person strives to set his own interests aside and look on the other from the posture of the “impartial spectator”, as Smith described it. Crucial in this process are the “narratives” which the parties recount to themselves, and Griswold draws interestingly on recent work in “narratology” in his search for the crucial factor in the process of psychic repair. This is the factor that permits a voiding of resentment in the one soul, and a self-giving through contrition in the other. Each party’s narrative is both an account of the injury, and an allocation of blame; ideal and reality, exoneration and fault, are all woven together, and forgiveness can be seen as in part an attempt to harmonize the narratives, so that the story comes to an end in a new beginning.

Griswold’s arguments are deep, far-reaching and all the more effective for the many interesting examples, drawn from recent events and biographical accounts. He sets a paradigm before us, in which one person injures another, seeks forgiveness and then receives it. The injury and the seeking are as important for Griswold as the final forgiveness, and he rightly rejects the view that forgiveness is simply a “gift” that can be bestowed by the injured party whatever the state of mind of the one who had hurt him. You don’t succeed in forgiving when you have shown no recognition of the fault, and you don’t recognize a fault if you regard it with indifference, and without the natural resentment with which one moral being receives the injuries inflicted by another.

Posted by Robin Varghese at 06:42 PM | Permalink

Comments

I think this is a good description of what forgiveness is in our society today - basically a kind of negotiation. I think originally in our culture the concept grew out of ideas we no longer care much about - especially the ideas of original sin and that the community may be more important than the individual. In other words, we are all sinners so we need to forgive each other, and also in a harsh world we have to work together and holding grudges may be a luxury we can't afford. Try watching the great silent film "Sunrise" with young people sometime. The basic story is that a woman realizes her husband is about to kill her. He chickens out, and then tries to apologize. In a church, he says to her (it's one of the intertitles) "Forgive me." She does. This kind of forgiveness is essentially incomprehensible to a modern audience, I think (although surprisingly the movie itself works pretty well). I'm not even saying it's admirable - I just don't think it's something we do any more.

Posted by: old man | Dec 16, 2007 5:07:34 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD ADVERTISING


3QD on Twitter


Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google


Recent Comments

Shatha on Saieen Zahoor, Rohail Hyatt, Noori: Aik Alif

Chris Horner on Want to keep your wallet? Carry a baby picture

John Ballard on Saieen Zahoor, Rohail Hyatt, Noori: Aik Alif

Lambness on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

aguy109 on A new technology called compressive sensing slims down data at the source

Christopher on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Ken Pidcock on Debating Unscientific America

Louise Gordon on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Jim on Wednesday Poem

DavidG on Are the "New Atheists" are Right-Wing on Foreign Policy?

Jonathan on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Norman Costa on Wednesday Poem

Carlos on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

giotto on Debating Unscientific America

Jonathan on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Louise Gordon on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Dave Ranning on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Dave Ranning on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Chris Schoen on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

billy on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Christopher on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Elatia Harris on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Louise Gordon on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Jonathan on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Dave Ranning on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton


Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.


The 3QD Prizes

Logo designed by Vicki Winters

Subscribe to this blog's feed