| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week | Main | On the Epistemology of Faith »

October 24, 2007

What the Fossil Record Tells Us About Climate Change

David Biello in Scientific American:

D2bfe67ee7f299df310a9baf3aa7f941__2

Roughly 251 million years ago, an estimated 70 percent of land plants and animals died, along with 84 percent of ocean organisms—an event known as the end Permian extinction. The cause is unknown but it is known that this period was also an extremely warm one. A new analysis of the temperature and fossil records over the past 520 million years reveals that the end of the Permian is not alone in this association: global warming is consistently associated with planetwide die-offs.

"There have been three major greenhouse phases in the time period we analyzed and the peaks in temperature of each coincide with mass extinctions," says ecologist Peter Mayhew of the University of York in England, who led the research examining the fossil and temperature records. "The fossil record and temperature data sets already existed but nobody had looked at the relationships between them."

Pairing these data—the relative number of different shallow sea organisms extant during a given time period and the record of temperature encased in the varying levels of oxygen isotopes in their shells over 10 million year intervals—reveals that eras with relatively high concentrations of greenhouse gases bode ill for the number of species on Earth. "The rule appears to be that greenhouse worlds adversely affect biodiversity," Mayhew says.

Posted by Robin Varghese at 02:10 PM | Permalink

Comments

I find it more than passing strange that SciAm could report that without mentioning this:

In 1991, scientists reported that the largest known volcanic event in the past 600 million years occurred at the same time as the end-Permian extinction. Magma extruded through coal-rich regions of the Earth's crust and blanketed a region the size of the continental United States with basalt to a depth of up to 6 kilometers.

Yeah, I can't imagine THAT had anything to do with it.

Posted by: Carlos | Oct 24, 2007 10:20:06 PM

We did. Check the link in the second paragraph for "mass extinctions" or just go here:

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=0003F84A-7433-138F-B38683414B7F4945

There are, of course, alternative theories (link from "cause is unknown"):

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=0002C42F-DB79-10A3-9B7983414B7F0000

The point of this story is to show that there is a correlation between warming and reductions in biodiversity.

Correlation is not causation, of course. As I mention in the last paragraph, the Ordovician die-off, the first we know of, was caused by cooling. So this is just an interesting fact that pops out when you compare the fossil record with the temperature record and needs following up.

Posted by: David Biello | Oct 25, 2007 10:54:04 AM

All this explains why Marilyn Monroe turned on her fan and put it in front of her open refrigerator in "The 7 Year Itch".

Posted by: aguy109 | Oct 25, 2007 11:22:29 AM

Thank you, David, for you personal reply.

I see the link. I don't see how it is contextually accurate, though, within a sentence about extinctions due to warming. If anything, a geological event of this magnitude falls under the category of "All Hell Breaks Loose," not "warming," and can't fairly be claimed to be referenced in an article that claims, merely, that the cause is unknown before launching into an exposition of the correlations with temperature.

So again, while I very much appreciate your response, I still think it's a bizarre construction, & suggest you really need to revise the article in order to remove the misleading implication.

Alternately, you could stand pat on Sun: 4,000°K - 100,000°K Biodiversity: none. Coincidence?

Just kidding. I do have a serious question though, since I have you on the phone, and if you are so inclined. There is lots of vague information about the Mid-Holocene Climate Optimum. It seems like it was a positive period for bio-diversity and general environmental "goodness" with herds of all sorts sporting about among the many lakes dotting what is now the great Sahara being preyed upon by a nascent human civilization that may well have really gotten started right there. It also seems like it was pretty darn warm. What I'd like to know is: how warm? How is it we have widely available proxy data about conditions 600k years ago but not 8k years ago?

Thank you

Carlos

Posted by: Carlos | Oct 25, 2007 11:52:44 AM

They just won't quit. And these folks don't even have a blog!

Science Magazine: Mass Extinctions: "Out With a Whimper Not a Bang"

Same story, permian mass die offs linked to CO2 buildup from some source they seem unable to determine. No mention here as in the SciAm article that during this period magma burned through massive coal beds and covered an area the size of North America. Yeah. It was a 500 ppm surge in CO2 that done it right? Or was it 100 times that alongside oxygen depletion and a millenia long winter.

I used to like my scientists better when they were driven by their brains and not their need for grant money.

Posted by: Carlos | Nov 13, 2007 10:57:51 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD ADVERTISING


3QD on Twitter


Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google


Recent Comments

Louise Gordon on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Jim on Wednesday Poem

DavidG on Are the "New Atheists" are Right-Wing on Foreign Policy?

Jonathan on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Norman Costa on Wednesday Poem

Carlos on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

giotto on Debating Unscientific America

Jonathan on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Louise Gordon on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Dave Ranning on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Dave Ranning on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Chris Schoen on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

billy on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Christopher on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Elatia Harris on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Louise Gordon on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Jonathan on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Dave Ranning on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

giotto on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Christopher on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Dave Ranning on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Bill on zizek does iran

billy on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Louise Gordon on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

J. Hawkins on Wednesday Poem


Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.


The 3QD Prizes

Logo designed by Vicki Winters

Subscribe to this blog's feed