| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Watson Retires From Cold Spring Harbor Lab | Main | looking to sol »

October 26, 2007

How Not To Be Racist

From Discover:

Race About 7 percent of white people, though, actually show a distinct lack of racism on probing psychological tests, says psychologist Robert Livingston of Northwestern University. Recently Livingston and Brian Drwecki of the University of Wisconsin studied these people to find out why they're not racist and, by implication, why the rest of us are. It turns out that the nonracists share a unique emotional style: They rarely form any negative associations, whether they're thinking about meaningless symbols or real human beings.

In their experiment, the researchers tested people’s tendency to form positive and negative associations by showing them written Chinese characters followed quickly by pictures of "good" things—like baby seals, flowers, and waterfalls—or pictures of “bad” things, like mutilated faces, snarling dogs, and feces. (Previous research has showed that Chinese characters are meaningless and appear neutral to English speakers.) The researchers presumed that the characters would take on positive or negative traits depending on what images they were paired with. And indeed, most people liked the characters that were paired with good pictures and disliked those linked to bad images.

A select few, though, did not form negative associations with Chinese characters. They made positive links just as often as anybody else, but the negative images didn’t stick in their minds. They seemed not to pay as much attention to negative information as others did and were less likely to form negative associations between two things. “They have rose-colored filters,” Livingston says.

It turns out these people are generally the same people who show no prejudice on the implicit racism test.

More here.

Posted by Azra Raza at 06:21 AM | Permalink

Comments

The link doesn't work.

Posted by: Simen | Oct 26, 2007 8:16:41 AM

true...is not working...

Posted by: pamela | Oct 26, 2007 9:29:52 AM

Try this;
http://discovermagazine.com/2007/oct/how-not-to-be-racist

Posted by: Pete Chapman | Oct 26, 2007 10:03:11 AM

Try this;
http://discovermagazine.com/2007/oct/how-not-to-be-racist

Posted by: Pete Chapman | Oct 26, 2007 10:03:32 AM

Try this;
http://discovermagazine.com/2007/oct/how-not-to-be-racist

Posted by: Pete Chapman | Oct 26, 2007 10:03:40 AM

Or click here.

Way to go Pete Chapman... itchy trigger finger?

Posted by: mrgoodbar | Oct 26, 2007 10:05:05 AM

Are you a bigot???? check this interesting site for links to the Harvard Implicit Association Test.

Posted by: James C. Collier | Oct 26, 2007 11:19:40 AM

Are you a bigot???? check this interesting site for links to the Harvard Implicit Association Test.

Posted by: James C. Collier | Oct 26, 2007 11:19:49 AM

Are you a bigot???? check this interesting site for links to the Harvard Implicit Association Test.

Posted by: James C. Collier | Oct 26, 2007 11:19:53 AM

Are you a bigot???? check this interesting site for links to the Harvard Implicit Association Test.

Posted by: James C. Collier | Oct 26, 2007 11:20:00 AM

"They rarely form any negative associations, whether they're thinking about meaningless symbols or real human beings."

Rather a high price to pay, never forming negative impressions of people. After all, Some people deserve to be disliked...these just don't happen to be conveniently tagged by skin color

Posted by: D | Oct 26, 2007 3:27:18 PM

“They have rose-colored filters,” Livingston says.

Surely, he meant to say "they are reasonable".

Posted by: yabonn | Oct 26, 2007 3:47:45 PM

"They rarely form any negative associations, whether they're thinking about meaningless symbols or real human beings."


NEWS FLASH: Study Discovers Non-Racists Are Hideously Boring!

Posted by: Nick Smyth | Oct 26, 2007 4:14:18 PM

Yabonn -

Is it reasonable to never form negative associations?

Posted by: Scott | Oct 26, 2007 4:36:51 PM

Yabonn -

Is it reasonable to never form negative associations?

Posted by: Scott | Oct 26, 2007 4:37:29 PM

Yabonn -

Is it reasonable to never form negative associations?

Posted by: Scott | Oct 26, 2007 4:37:41 PM

Scott,

No, but it's reasonable to not associate negative images and chinese ideograms.

I find the article's tone (the 7 percents are unable) and Mr Livingston sentence (the 7 percent are deluded) puzzling.

Posted by: yabonn | Oct 26, 2007 6:18:59 PM

"it's reasonable to not associate negative images and chinese ideograms."

That's neither here nor there. It is probably unreasonable to form any impression - positive or negative - of a Chinese character based on whether you see a waterfall or feces immediately after seeing it. If you know how to make brains stop doing silly things like this without turning off the "form associations" feature altogether, you're on to something big.

In the mean time, this entire test is founded on the assumption that people do associate events that are temporally close together. Given this, the question becomes: are negative impressions of Chinese characters okay, or must one form only positive evaluations?

If the former, these seven percent are indeed "buggy". That conclusion doesn't imply that not being racist is a bug, of course. It merely means this is a pretty awful way of achieving that outcome.

Posted by: D | Oct 26, 2007 6:49:48 PM

Ah, true D and Scott : I had missed the line about the ideogram being tested neutral to English speakers.

Still feels very weird. Wonder how the not-racist and 7-percent sets overlap.

Posted by: yabonn | Oct 27, 2007 9:35:55 AM

Yeah, there are times when not forming negative impressions can be deadly. Take a hypothetical example of a hiker walking in a field where there is a snake and a very pretty flower...if the hiker had the emotional learning style as presented in Livingston & Drwecki 2007, s/he would be drawn to the flower, not notice the snake, and possibly get bitten. In fact, great researchers have shown that the tendency to weight negatives greater than positive is a natural human response (see the work of John Cacioppo and the infamous work of Kahneman and Tversky).

This paper implicitly gives a strong critique of our society. Think about it, in order for the natural tendency (see above) to weight negatives greater than positives, to lead to biased responding (and the reverse to lead to nonbiased responding) there must be an overabundance of negativity paired with African Americans in our society. Stated more bluntly, if our society did not so readily pair negativity with African American (in the media, on the TV, in magazines, in Laws, etc..)then emotional learning styles that are probably outside of conscious control would have very little relation to prejudice.
Stated even more bluntly....if the average person (the non nonprejuidced individual) was not bombarded with negative information,images, affective messages, etc.. about African Americans then their natural tendencies to attend to negative over positive information would not lead to bias. I guess if you look at if from this angle, the answer may not be a re-conditioning of each individual, but a fairer country that not only portrays people of all different races equally but also gives people an equal opportunity (something that I don't believe this country currently does, but is something for a different blog).

Thank you for your interest in this article, it's great to see that people are really thinking about this extremely important issue.

Thank you,

Brian Drwecki...Graduate Student UW-Madison...
drwecki@wisc.edu

Keep Fighting the good fight...& I dig the blog

Posted by: Brian Drwecki | Nov 3, 2007 9:38:20 PM

I listen to the same music and media, as everybody else does. live in an area very close to one of the poster cities for African-American urban blight and hopelessness. Further, I was raised by a woman who I have to say was racist towards Blacks. I consider myself to be completely average in this area.

And yet Haavaad feels that my "...data suggest little to no automatic preference between African American and European American."

I don't think the media has much to do with it. I think it's probably more due to actual people you have met. The Black guy who mugged me 20 years ago, but then gave me a dollar back for the subway may have spoiled me as a racist forever! Lord willing, he is reading this very thread. Thanks bro (but I had 60 bucks in my other pocket, lol)!

Posted by: Carlos | Nov 3, 2007 10:55:02 PM

Carlos,

You may be overlooking the possibility that you are one of those individuals that don't attend to negatives; therefore, the media would not have a negative effect on you. In my comment, I was talking about the average individual, and you may be fortunate enough to have the low negative high positive affective learning style.

Cheers,

Brian

Posted by: Brian | Nov 4, 2007 1:23:53 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD ADVERTISING


3QD on Twitter


Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google


Recent Comments

Ken Pidcock on Debating Unscientific America

Louise Gordon on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Jim on Wednesday Poem

DavidG on Are the "New Atheists" are Right-Wing on Foreign Policy?

Jonathan on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Norman Costa on Wednesday Poem

Carlos on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

giotto on Debating Unscientific America

Jonathan on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Louise Gordon on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Dave Ranning on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Dave Ranning on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Chris Schoen on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

billy on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Christopher on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Elatia Harris on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Louise Gordon on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Jonathan on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Dave Ranning on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

giotto on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Christopher on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Dave Ranning on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Bill on zizek does iran

billy on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Louise Gordon on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton


Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.


The 3QD Prizes

Logo designed by Vicki Winters

Subscribe to this blog's feed