September 26, 2007
Zuckerman Undone
Christopher Hitchens in The Atlantic Monthly:
Having assumed the title of this very slight novel to be drawn from the famous stage direction in Hamlet, I was quite braced for some Rothian reflections on the Oedipal, with plenty of reluctant and dutiful visits to wheezed-out Jewish fathers in the wilderness of postindustrial New Jersey, and to the grisly wives and mothers who had drained them dry and made them into husks. But the reference is actually to another sort of father figure: a dead and almost-forgotten writer called E. I. Lonoff, who had been a hero and mentor to the young Nathan Zuckerman. According to Lonoff's relict, a terminal brain-cancer patient named Amy Bellette, the great man had once instructed her to take down the following aperçu: "Reading/writing people, we are finished, we are ghosts witnessing the end of the literary era."
By the time that he encounters this rather ordinary valediction, which occurs in the second half of the book, Zuckerman has been revealed as highly disposed to hear it. He has been stuck on the top of a Massachusetts mountain for 11 years, seeing almost nobody and ignoring the news and, by the sound of it, not getting much work done. His prostate has turned against him in a big way, forcing him to wear Pampers and to endure the regular humiliation of feeling sodden. Returning to New York in the hope of an operation to repair his urinary arrangements (a hope that proves vain), he is geezerishly astonished by the prevalence of cell phones and by the general cultural barbarity. But this feeling of nausea and alienation is by no means enough to quell his excitement when he notices one of those apartment-swap ads in the New York Review of Books, and sees that some young couple wants a place just like his in the rural fastnesses.
Am I by any chance boring you? I promise that I have done my best to put a light skip into this summary of a weary trudge. Roth's own method of alleviation we can see coming a mile off: The female half of the want-ad couple will turn out to be a fox, offering the ghost of a chance that Zuckerman's flaccid and piss-soaked member can be revived. And so it proves.
More here.
Posted by Azra Raza at 10:10 AM | Permalink






Comments
Funny revue, great read.
Posted by: aguy109 | Sep 26, 2007 10:19:08 AM
Disagree. Roth's an easy target for a lazy writer and that about summarizes Hitchen's recent output.
Posted by: Todd and in Charge | Sep 26, 2007 11:50:34 AM
Oooh, funny! That Christopher Hitchens can really take you down. Especially when he knows the best of your novels will be read by many long after his own brilliantly funny and politically horrifying essays will matter not much more than "The Rape of the Lock."
Also, as long as we're on the topic of narcissism twinned with a flagging prose style, with special reference to prostatically enlarged, collapsing white male writers of a certain age guilty of turning themselves on as they write, or even writing to turn themselves on, then just where does this leave Hitch? Able to do ravishing things for himself with his thumbs on the spacer bar, I would guess...
Posted by: Elatia Harris | Sep 26, 2007 11:56:38 AM
I'ts difficult to tell from this review which of them, Roth or Hitch, is more obsessed with visualizations of male organs and solitary activities.
Per Elatia, he might be able to manage thumb. Not thumbs
Posted by: Carlos | Sep 26, 2007 12:51:13 PM
I've always felt Roth was over-rated. His ego gets in the way, to a degree that is simply obnoxious.
Posted by: Luke Lea | Sep 26, 2007 1:24:15 PM
"Having assumed the title of this very slight novel to be drawn from the famous stage direction in Hamlet, I was quite braced for some Rothian reflections on the Oedipal, with plenty of reluctant and dutiful visits to wheezed-out Jewish fathers in the wilderness of postindustrial New Jersey, and to the grisly wives and mothers who had drained them dry and made them into husks."--why make this assumption from that title? Which was the last novel in which Roth dealt with those items? In fact, Exit Zuckerman or Lonoff, and Belle Lettrres (Ann) is perhaps merely echoing the thoughts of an aging sick guy--not Roth but his character. But more to the point: if you do not like Roth's writing, simply ignore him and reviews about him.
Posted by: fred lapides | Sep 26, 2007 3:44:08 PM
Post a comment