| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« science and language | Main | The Meaning of Life »

September 09, 2007

Torture, Structural Adjustment and the Limits of "Shock" as Metaphor

Amitava Kumar raises some questions on the new Alfonso Cuarón and Naomi Klein movie:

This brief video was put on YouTube two days ago and was sent my way by Liz Blum. We start with electroshock therapy and a connection is revealed between that form of treatment and CIA experiments on torture; and then, the shock doctrine in torture is related to the shock doctrine of free market economy preached by Milton Friedman. Does one argument lead seamlessly to the other? The metaphor of shock is a powerful one, and the film-makers exploit it to provoke a connection that is—well, shocking. I hope it sparks debates everywhere.

Posted by Robin Varghese at 03:01 PM | Permalink

Comments

Even though the intentions of the Cuarón/Klein ad/clip are praiseworthy, I find disingenuous and sketchy their extension of the concept of shock across laughable early 20th century propaganda for psychiatric treatment, CIA torture technique, and then "crisis" more broadly. It reminds me of a film a few years back (also otherwise praiseworthy) called "The Corporation" that relied on psychologizing corporations as "psychotic" (or schizophrenic, I can't remember which.) The key strategy of the two being not just to portray capitalism as pathological to the "humanity" that we all presumably share, but to embody it in sickly psyches - either their own or their victims. Mneh. Dominion of the vampiric and frankensteiny. The left MUST be able to both critical and populizing in a more effective way.

Much more problematic though, is the moment when we have a "shocking" montage of text listing situations of crisis around the globe, and the policies instituted shortly thereafter. If information is a shock absorber/protector, I DIDN'T HAVE TIME TO READ THE INFORMATION. Not allowed. Makes the filmmakers' otherwise laudable intentions look hysterical and dependent on scaring and confusing their audience. For that, I'd rather the Radiohead.

n.b. Why is this a FILM BY Alfonso Cuarón/Naomi Klein when Jonás Cuarón is the editor and director. What is Alfonso Cuarón's role in this? What is this ridiculous Mexican anxiety over full filmic authorship? Film by = write and direct (and usually produce as well.) No exceptions.

Posted by: Tradditore | Sep 10, 2007 10:17:41 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD ADVERTISING


3QD on Twitter


Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google


Recent Comments

Jim on Wednesday Poem

DavidG on Are the "New Atheists" are Right-Wing on Foreign Policy?

Jonathan on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Norman Costa on Wednesday Poem

Carlos on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

giotto on Debating Unscientific America

Jonathan on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Louise Gordon on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Dave Ranning on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Dave Ranning on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Chris Schoen on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

billy on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Christopher on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Elatia Harris on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Louise Gordon on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Jonathan on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Dave Ranning on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

giotto on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Christopher on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Dave Ranning on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Bill on zizek does iran

billy on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Louise Gordon on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

J. Hawkins on Wednesday Poem

Lambness on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton


Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.


The 3QD Prizes

Logo designed by Vicki Winters

Subscribe to this blog's feed