April 27, 2007
MacKinnon: ‘Women are not human’
Women are not in charge. Worldwide, it is men — not their gender counterparts — who have power over families, clans, villages, cities, and nations. That may not seem like a new message. But lawyer, feminist author, and international equal rights advocate Catharine A. MacKinnon gives it a new subtlety, adds legal context — and even includes a ray of hope. MacKinnon, who once taught at Harvard Law School, is a professor of law at the University of Michigan and one of the most widely cited legal scholars in the English language. She visited the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study last week (April 19) to deliver the annual Maurine and Robert Rothschild Lecture: “Women’s Status, Men’s States.”
MacKinnon — tall, regal, and with a gift for precise talk — has star power, and drew 250 people to a jammed Radcliffe Gymnasium. At Radcliffe, MacKinnon could just as well have called her lecture “Are Women Human?” In case you wondered, the answer to that question is no — perhaps to be expected in a book that includes an essay titled “Rape as Nationbuilding.” In legal terms, women are not human, according to MacKinnon, who discovered that fact while parsing the language of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The 1948 United Nations document defines what a human is, and what people are universally entitled to — but fails to explicitly recognize women, and their “full human status in social reality,” said MacKinnon.
Being human first requires being “real to power,”
More here.
Posted by Azra Raza at 07:29 AM | Permalink























Comments
Ye Gods! Who moved the rock? This woman is clearly delusional - did she ever bother to follow the money-trails? She's speaking in legal terms the moment she can use it to put 'women' in a victim role, and she's speaking in very real-world terms the next moment, when she can use it to depict 'men' as savages. Catharine A. MacKinnon clearly identifies with women, but her stance has got little to do with humanism.
Sometimes a strong man is backed up by a strong woman, sometimes it's a weak man that's being manipulated by a woman. Gustav Klimt is going to get his worst nightmare fullfilled if people like MacKinnon would rule the world. I'm pretty sure there are quite a few ways to reason that men aren't legally human, either, but I don't see her putting the same zeal into a similar study to discredit such a statement.
Posted by: Yiri | Apr 27, 2007 10:32:37 AM
I think Yiri's penis shriveled a bit while contemplating Woman. Not his kind of human, eh? And ratifying it all with Klimt's nightmare is just cheesy, really.
Posted by: TO | Apr 27, 2007 4:58:44 PM
What "gymnasium" can be "packed" by only 250 people?
Posted by: RJ | Apr 27, 2007 5:58:16 PM
Resorting to ad hominem attacks on Yiri's argument is quite low. Then again, I wouldn't expect someone who disagrees with Yiri's point to do anything else, seeing as how MacKinnon's argument is plainly indefensible. It is simply more misandrist nonsense from a pioneer of modern-day misandry. That so many people take an enemy of anything male, not to mention civil rights (such as free speech) like Catharine MacKinnon seriously ought to frighten everyone.
Posted by: firebrand | Apr 28, 2007 2:37:43 AM
firebrand,
The ad hom was low, however your comment was no more commendable and a fallacy of argument in itself.
Posted by: firebrand response | Apr 28, 2007 10:03:27 AM
Are woman human? Is a dog an animal? Is blue a color?
Is the modern academy a fraud playing useless word games?
Posted by: Dana | Apr 28, 2007 4:03:36 PM
One of MacKinnon's arguments has been that "human rights" are defined in terms of the sorts of violation governments perpetrate against men (and women). But the sort of violence that regularly befalls women -- domestic abuse, rape -- when it's not perpetrated by a government, hasn't tended to get classified as a human rights problem, even if it's so common in a country that a significant percentage of women get victimized. If year after year murder by a partner is one of the leading causes of death for women 18-30, as it is in the U.S. -- if rape is common and all women live with fear of it, as in the U.S. -- that country still gets to count as not having a "human" rights problem.
Posted by: Matthew | Apr 28, 2007 11:44:06 PM
Since when has the word "human" been used a noun. It is an adjective, and "human being" is a noun.
Posted by: Rene | May 1, 2007 11:07:14 AM
Post a comment