| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« How Chicago became the blues capital of the world | Main | Yeah it's a parasite — but in a good way »

April 29, 2007

FLAT EARTH: The History of an Infamous Idea

Christopher Hart on Christine Garwood's book, in the Sunday Times:

U_flatearthUp until 1492, when Columbus sailed the ocean blue, everyone believed the earth was flat. Since then, everyone has known better. In fact, as Christine Garwood demonstrates in this quirky and highly entertaining slice of intellectual history, both these statements are false. The Ancient Greeks knew very well that they lived on a globe, while the Flat Earth News ceased publication only in 1988.

Not the least attractive thing about Garwood’s study is her criticism of modern scientists whose arrogant assumption that the present always trumps the past only flatters their self-esteem. She dismisses “supposed Christian closed-mindedness” as a post-Enlightenment myth. The Church was at the forefront of intellectual and scientific discovery for centuries. Indeed, it’s really quite stupid and credulous of us now to believe that most medieval people thought Columbus would fall off the edge of the world. They could see as well as you or I that a ship disappears over the horizon after a few miles, or that during a lunar eclipse, the shadow of the earth on the moon is round. Duh. There was “no mutiny of flat-earth sailors on the Santa Maria”.

Plato, Aristotle, Euclid, Archimedes, Ptolemy, St Augustine and Bede were all firm “globularists”, in Garwood’s pleasing neologism, while Newton refined things still further by showing that we really lived on an “oblate spheroid” (the earth bulges in the middle, to you and me). As with scientology, belief in alien abduction, or wildly overpriced face creams containing such bogus substances as “micro-oils”, for real stupidity you need a dash of dodgy modern science.

More here.

Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 03:24 AM | Permalink

Comments

I think that in 1492 the vast majority of people "around" the world would have told you that the earth was flat. How many had read Claudius Ptolemy? How many had acted as lookouts on a sea voyage? I myself realized not long ago that the sphericity of the earth really doesn't affect me as much as the daily experience of my local geography . It's relatively flat. So what if that's an "illusion"? (And the sun really does travel across the sky!) I think that being "scientifically minded" and so very logical has actually harmed me. I am speaking from the vantage of over fifty years of experience. Does one really grasp a greater truth imagining the world as it looks from without? Maybe it is more useful and meaningful for human beings to grasp what it means to be human and be able to share that with every other human regardless of what they know or don't know about "the greater reality". I know it is blasphemy (haven't I heard that before?) but does scientific knowledge really make you a better person? I used to think so, but I can't see that it has helped me that much. I am as poor as dirt, my dogs are dead, and I don't have any friends- HA!

Posted by: aquariid | Apr 30, 2007 3:15:40 AM

It is nice to know that someone, somewhere, is still defending the Flat Earth view, if only for reasons of solipcism and exagerated navel contemplation.

Posted by: aguy109 | Apr 30, 2007 4:15:15 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Jalees Rehman on The need for critical science journalism

Dredd on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Dredd on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Scrutineer on Why race as a biological construct matters

prasad on the culture animal

Mitt Romney's Dog on Why race as a biological construct matters

Elatia Harris on The Moral Status of Rocks

prasad on The Moral Status of Rocks

Raza Husain on The Moral Status of Rocks

Fred on Unknown Mathematician Proves Elusive Property of Prime Numbers

Joel Grant on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Tomboktu on Why is Europe so Messed Up? An Illuminating History

Joe on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Jalees Rehman on The Science Mystique

Dredd on The Moral Status of Rocks

sjg on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Dredd on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Ken Pidcock on The need for critical science journalism

Louise Gordon on Why race as a biological construct matters

Louise Gordon on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

musafir on a pretty funny book

freddie on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

freddie on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

Junaida on Tuesday Poem

rafiq on Tuesday Poem

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed