| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Worldmapper Maps Health | Main | Essay Linking Liberal Jews and Anti-Semitism Sparks a Furor »

January 31, 2007

Muhammad Ali: The Brand and the Man

Dave Zirin in The Nation:

Alimuhammad22Muhammad Ali's brilliance was not that he was some kind of antiwar prophet. He wasn't Malcolm X or Martin Luther King Jr. in boxing gloves, debating foreign policy between rounds. But unlike the Ivy League advisers who made up the "best and brightest," Ali understood then that there was justice and injustice, right and wrong. He knew that not taking a stand could be as political a statement as taking one. This was Ali's code, and he never wavered.

In early 1966 the US Army came calling for Ali, and he was classified 1-A for the draft. He got the news surrounded by reporters and blurted one of the most famous phrases of the decade, "Man, I ain't got no quarrel with them Vietcong."

This was an astounding statement. As Mike Marqusee outlines in his Redemption Song: Muhammad Ali and the Spirirt of the 60s, there was little opposition to the war at the time. The antiwar movement was in its infancy, and most of the country still stood behind the President. Life magazine's cover read, "Vietnam: The War Is Worth Winning." The song "Ballad of the Green Berets" was climbing the charts. And then there was Ali. As longtime peace activist Daniel Berrigan said, "It was a major boost to an antiwar movement that was very white. He was not an academic or a bohemian or a clergyman. He couldn't be dismissed as cowardly."

More here.

Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 05:02 PM | Permalink

Comments

Sadly Ali's true radicality-- this opposition to Vietnam-- is consistently downplayed today now that he has been converted into a harmless global icon. Surely had he been in better health he would have been in open opposition to the Iraq War, as was only briefly hinted in his White House appearance when he gave the President the "crazy" twirl...

http://youtube.com/watch?v=yT9ZrJqIMSM

Posted by: Dan Quiles | Jan 31, 2007 5:12:25 PM

Ali was no saint; he humiliated opponents personally and brutally not just through his fists - business as usual of course - but through his public assaults on their dignity outside the ring. But yet I admire him anyway. Maybe assaulting the dignity of your opponents as he did to Frazier, Foreman and so many others is the only way you can muster the courage and will to prevail in this the most brutal, unsaintly of sports.

Posted by: Bruce/Crablaw | Jan 31, 2007 5:20:31 PM

His unabashedly racist characterizations of Frazier in particular are horrific to watch today. These have also been, excuse the term, whitewashed, in the service of converting Ali into a warm and fuzzy handicapped hero. In truth he was an embodiment of the deeply violent and difficult politics of the 1960s. What he should be most commended for is his fearless commingling of politics with sports, something that today seems unthinkable for an iconic athlete.

Posted by: Dan Quiles | Feb 1, 2007 7:59:19 AM

Muhammad Ali was a beast!!!

Posted by: Mike Hunt | Nov 30, 2009 2:00:31 PM

float like butter fly sting like a bee!!!

Posted by: Mike Hunt | Nov 30, 2009 2:01:51 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

freddie on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Eli on "Everybody Hurts" by Sachal Studios, Lahore, Pakistan

Jalees Rehman on The need for critical science journalism

Dredd on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Dredd on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Scrutineer on Why race as a biological construct matters

prasad on the culture animal

Mitt Romney's Dog on Why race as a biological construct matters

Elatia Harris on The Moral Status of Rocks

prasad on The Moral Status of Rocks

Raza Husain on The Moral Status of Rocks

Fred on Unknown Mathematician Proves Elusive Property of Prime Numbers

Joel Grant on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Tomboktu on Why is Europe so Messed Up? An Illuminating History

Joe on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Jalees Rehman on The Science Mystique

Dredd on The Moral Status of Rocks

sjg on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Dredd on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Ken Pidcock on The need for critical science journalism

Louise Gordon on Why race as a biological construct matters

Louise Gordon on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

musafir on a pretty funny book

freddie on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

freddie on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed