October 28, 2006
Why I will cast my vote for Green/Rainbow on Nov. 7
John Walsh in Worcester Telegram:
Never before in my memory have the two major parties so sullied themselves and so obviously betrayed the American people as they have by voting for the war in Iraq and supporting it since. True, George W. Bush and his neocon advisers took the lead in lying to the people. But at every step of the way the Democratic Party went along with a war based on lies and deceit, a war that has killed or maimed tens of thousands of Americans and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis.
As the saying goes: Bush lied. Democrats complied. Thousands died.Let us recall that the vote to go to war was taken in October 2002, when the midterm elections were only weeks away. Looking at the votes on the war, which 22 Democrats and 1 Republican opposed — much to their credit — many of the Democratic pro-war votes were cast either by those with tight races ahead, like Max Cleland and Tom Daschle, or else those with presidential ambitions, like Kerry, Edwards, Clinton, Lieberman, Biden and others. (Cleland and Daschle lost anyway — deservedly so.) Of course these worthies contend that Bush successfully deceived them.
But that confession is an admission of incompetence since millions around the world saw through Bush’s lies and so did 23 Senators. But deception is not the likely explanation; ambition is. If Ted Kennedy knew better, then is it believable that his close colleague, John Kerry, and others did not?
And every single senatorial vote was crucial on that day of infamy. If only 11 others had joined the 23 nays in a strong stand against being stampeded into war if they sustained a filibuster, we would not be in Iraq today. What greater issue is there than war? But these senators joined their Republican counterparts and put their careers and ambitions ahead of the fate of untold thousands of innocents.
What manner of men and women are these?
More here.
Posted by Azra Raza at 07:46 AM | Permalink






















Comments
A bit overboard. There were many in Con gress and in the nation who thought that Saddam did in fact have WMD--Bush lied or did not seriously know. Wewere told that top intelligence reports supported this. We were taken in then either by lies or by faulty intelligence. To suggest that votes were based upon election cocsiderations is questionable. Many people honestly believed that Saddam supported terror groups, that WMD were in Iraq etc. If the writer is so opposed to both parties, he would do well to recognize that the nation for better or worse will continue to be run by those two parties, and that if this is to be the way in America, heought to give serious consideration to finding a place more to his liking, a spot where political leaders and bureaucrats are honest and aboive board. Sorry but I can notname a spot for him.
Posted by: fred lapides | Oct 28, 2006 12:13:38 PM
Fine sensibilities. Fine, fine sensibilities. I'm sure Dick Cheney is deeply gratified.
What a solipsistic creep.
Posted by: joseph duemer | Oct 28, 2006 8:22:18 PM
Post a comment