| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Mira Nair's Namesake blends two worlds | Main | Ngugi wa Thiong'o's Wizard of the Crow »

September 24, 2006

The Rights of the Intersexed

In The New York Times Magazine, what, if anything, should be done with intersexed (or hemaphroditic) children.

At the heart of the controversy is the question of whether intersex children should have surgery to make their genitals look more normal. Chase has talked to thousands of doctors and others in the medical profession, making the case that being born intersex should not be treated as shameful and require early surgery. In doing so, she has assembled an impressive intellectual arsenal, drawing on everything from the Nuremberg Code and its prohibition against experimental medical procedures without patient consent to the concept of “monster ethics” — the idea that we perform questionable medical procedures on certain patients, like intersex people and conjoined twins, when we consider those patients to be less than human. Reports on the frequency of intersex births vary widely: Chase claims 1 in 2,000; more conservative estimates from experts put it at 1 in 4,500. Whatever the case, intersex is roughly as common as cystic fibrosis, and while the outcome of the debate Chase has stirred is directly pertinent to a limited number of families, her arguments force all of us to confront some basic issues about sexual identity, birth anomalies and what rights parents have in physically shaping their kids. Will a child grow up to enjoy a better life if he or she is saved from the trials of maturing in a funny-looking body? Or will that child be better off if he or she is loved and accepted, at least at home, exactly as he or she is?

Posted by Robin Varghese at 01:06 PM | Permalink

Comments

Anyone with any interest in intersex issues (and they are fascinating!) should be reading Alice Dreger.

Posted by: Bill Hooker | Sep 24, 2006 2:38:03 PM

People will debate the surgically "normalization" of a child's genitals to augment its chances for being "better off", but the idea of an alteration of society - economically, environmentally - so that children might be "better off" is met by yawns and smirks, and flinches of discomfort.

Posted by: roy belmont | Sep 25, 2006 3:29:13 AM

Personally, I truly miss the freaks on the streets. Ask yourself: how many giants are living on your block? how many midgets? Diversity is strength, not a weakness.

"Other children will make fun of your child, but we can fix this even before your child is born! It will be easier that way for your child to adapt!"

Nobody seems to be surprised any more when a child is born with 2 arms, 2 legs, and 1 head.

So, hell yeah, let's take away this last bit of individuality too, and 'fix' the whole sexual issue too >:-(

I prefer to be quite unlike everbody else, just like everybody else.

Posted by: Yiri | Sep 25, 2006 8:02:04 AM

Just like you, Yiri, I don't want to be like anyone else.

Posted by: roy belmont | Sep 25, 2006 5:13:36 PM

Why is it wrong to repair a severe disfigurement? Why not repair a child's hair lip, for instance? Infringement on individuality? I dont think yiri would like his/her child to grow up as a freak if the effects could be reduced through surgery.

Posted by: aguy109 | Sep 26, 2006 9:39:29 AM

Actually, I would.

At least my child would have some distinct features to set itself apart from the oh so average majority of our species.

My opinion would be different in cases where the disfigurement becomes life-threatening, though.

Posted by: Yiri | Oct 13, 2006 9:39:25 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

soubriquet on Tuesday Poem

Eli on Unknown Mathematician Proves Elusive Property of Prime Numbers

Jim on Tuesday Poem

Josef Stern on Unknown Mathematician Proves Elusive Property of Prime Numbers

Shelley on Is the Brain No Different From a Light Switch? The Uncomfortable Ideas of the Philosopher Daniel Dennett

Bill on The Beautiful German Language

Eleutheria on The Bystander Effect in Medical Care. Why Do I Have So Many Doctors Not Taking Care of Me?

Eleutheria on Tuesday Poem

Raza Husain on the culture animal

musafir on The Bystander Effect in Medical Care. Why Do I Have So Many Doctors Not Taking Care of Me?

KRS on Tuesday Poem

Félix E. F. Larocca, MD on Tuesday Poem

LWR on Tuesday Poem

Joss on Tuesday Poem

LWR on POETRY IN TRANSLATION: CORDOBA

Rashid on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

Yoann on The Bystander Effect in Medical Care. Why Do I Have So Many Doctors Not Taking Care of Me?

Dave Ranning on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

sadhana on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

Carol Westbrook on The Bystander Effect in Medical Care. Why Do I Have So Many Doctors Not Taking Care of Me?

Ken Bryant on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

Umer Vakil on POETRY IN TRANSLATION: CORDOBA

Kabir on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

seth edenbaum on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

Nina on White Indians

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed