Wednesday, May 31, 2006
WHY THE U.N. CAN'T SAVE DARFUR
Eric Reeves in The New Republic:
Actually, far from suggesting that the United Nations can save Darfur, the developments of the last few weeks provide an excellent illustration of why the international body will never be able to stop the genocide. Indeed, the most recent Security Council resolution does more to highlight Darfur's exceedingly grim future than to suggest that security for civilians or humanitarian operations will improve anytime in the near term. We might recall that there have been seven previous U.N. Security Council resolutions on Darfur, none of which has halted the genocide. These previous resolutions, which together constitute a shameful record of impotence, are recounted in the most recent resolution--unwittingly drawing attention to just how useless Turtle Bay's steady stream of diplomatic activity on Darfur has been. Unfortunately, there is no reason to believe that this time will be any different.
First, it's worth understanding just how bad the situation on the ground in Darfur has become--despite the recent peace agreement signed in Abuja that many believe could open the way for U.N. troops.
Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 03:43 PM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c562c53ef00d8352d717b53ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference WHY THE U.N. CAN'T SAVE DARFUR: