April 26, 2006
Congress Considers E-Enclosure
Lindsay Beyerstein on proposed legislation that threatens to change the internet for the worse:
Phone companies must treat all calls equally, regardless of where they come from, where they're going, or what the callers are saying. Historically, the same non-discrimination policy also covered Internet communications.(Matthew Yglesias also writes on the issue in The American Prospect.)Now, a handful of giant telecom companies and their allies in Congress are on the verge of abolishing net neutrality for broadband internet. (Video)
Art Brodsky explains:
The telephone companies, which carried all of the Web traffic until relatively recently, had to treat all of their calls alike without giving any Web site or service favored treatment over another.
Posted by Robin Varghese at 10:40 AM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c562c53ef00d83485c8f653ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Congress Considers E-Enclosure:






















Comments
An understanding of TCP/IP packet traffic transfer protocols would get this non-issue off the radar screen.
Internet traffic data is encapsulated in numbered packets. The requestor process reassembles these packets, requests retransmission of damaged packets, and then presents the product to the user. This is not an issue when dealing with email, or even file transfers. This becomes a major issue when you are trying to view video or hold a two-way voice conversation.
'Net neurtality' actually presumes that the TCP/IP design was perfect, and requires no improvement. Nonsense.
This area is ripe for demagoguery. Beware.
Posted by: Don McArthur | Apr 26, 2006 11:29:57 AM
Phone companies must treat all calls equally, regardless of where they come from, where they're going, or what the callers are saying.
I don't think this is actually true. I seem to recall that because the cell phone network was jammed in NYC on 9/11, cell phone companies implemented a way for certain cell phones to have network priority. And I wonder whether the cell phones of the upper management of a given cell phone company get prioity nonetheless. Can anyone speak to this?
Posted by: Eric | Apr 26, 2006 2:31:19 PM
Eric, Common Carrier requirements prohibit discrimination, and much of telecom services are classified as common carrier by the Telecommunications Act of 1934 (and upheld in the 1996 ammendments)>
Posted by: Robin | Apr 26, 2006 2:51:42 PM
"I don't think this is actually true. I seem to recall that because the cell phone network was jammed in NYC on 9/11, cell phone companies implemented a way for certain cell phones to have network priority. And I wonder whether the cell phones of the upper management of a given cell phone company get prioity nonetheless. Can anyone speak to this?
"
NYC was an emergency situation, rules go to hell when the shit hits the fan.
Posted by: Ben | May 19, 2006 12:27:43 PM
Post a comment