March 30, 2006
Considering "Closure"
Sparked by Dahlia Lithwick's piece on the death penalty, Lindsay Beyerstein considers "closure".
I am deeply suspicious of the concept of closure. The general public and policy-makers take it as an article of faith that there is something called closure that the criminal justice system can help provide. Even Dalia Lithwick takes it more or less for granted that closure is real. She just questions whether executions are the best way to help survivors achieve it.Intuitively, we all know more or less what closure is supposed to be. At first grief is overwhelming and all-consuming, but eventually it fades enough for the bereaved person to get on with life. Closure has something to do with that transition.
Upon closer examination, the concept of closure turns out to be much more elusive that we might have supposed.
Closure might refer the emotional shift from acute grief to emotional healing. Alternatively, might to describe some psychological or practical prerequisites that must be in place in order for a person to transcend acute grief (e.g., time, insight, restitution...).
Posted by Robin Varghese at 10:27 AM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c562c53ef00d834b46cae69e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Considering "Closure":






















Comments
It strikes me that the criminal justice system should not be in the business of offering emotional recompense for the victims of crime. Closure in this context seems to be a very old concept indeed: revenge, now couched in the pop psychology jargon of the times. We should not heed the mob's calls for blood.
Posted by: John Ganz | Mar 30, 2006 11:31:18 AM
Post a comment