September 27, 2005
Johnson's dictionary
It takes an eccentric to read dictionaries for pleasure. I do not use the word insultingly; I am glad that there are such people out there, and I wish there were more. however, in the category of works that are admired more than they are read—the Faerie Queene and Remembrance of Things Past are typical members—a dictionary must be at the absolute top of the list. While Samuel Johnson’s Dictionary of the English Language, which celebrates its two hundred and fiftieth anniversary this year, is a greatly admired book, it is also surely one of the least read. Yet Macaulay called it “the first dictionary which could be read with pleasure,” and even a short look at it will reveal the truth of his assessment.
more from Bookforum here.
Posted by Morgan Meis at 02:53 PM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c562c53ef00d83458dcc953ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Johnson's dictionary:























Comments
The prized tome in my library is my thesaurus.
Posted by: Stefany | Sep 27, 2005 8:21:22 PM
Just yesterday, I was typing parts of the Preface into a blog entry here and I was struck by Johnson's mixture of predictions about the Dictionary's reception. On one hand, he fully expected to facilitate the reading of English thought in the world and help to extend the longevity of an evolving language, but on the other, he is resigned to the complete thanklessness of his task. I wonder what he would have thought of its current usage and standing in scholarly opinion. Maybe he wouldn't have been surprised at all.
Posted by: Carrie | Sep 28, 2005 1:35:00 AM
Post a comment