Thursday, August 26, 2004
Physicans vs. "naturopaths"
Following up on Sughra's post, a debate-discussion between physicians and "naturopaths" on the PBS show Closer to Truth addresses how to evaluate alternative medicine.
The "two sides argue fiercely about the efficacy and dangers of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Three of the guests can see both sides of the issue to various degrees. Only retired physician Wallace Sampson, Editor in Chief, Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine sees the field in black and white '…what we're dealing with in most of alternative medicine is self-delusion.' His points are cogent: how can standardization occur when naturopathic remedies are effected by such things as growing conditions, time of harvest, and length of storage? Dan Labriola, a naturopathic physician who specializes in cancer and heart diseases actually concurs: what PR company has ever publicized that the use of tests show that certain antioxidants prevent the effects of chemotherapy from killing tumor cells? But scientific testing also corroborates the effectiveness of the natural substances glucosamine and chondroitin for joint and cartilage-related pain. And mold from the common canteloupe provided the first effective immunizations for Polio."
Watch it here (click on the video images).
Posted by Robin Varghese at 03:51 PM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c562c53ef00d8342e9ef853ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Physicans vs. "naturopaths":